Reputable outlets only (Reuters, WSJ, CNBC, Barron's, and peers). More on Google News ↗
What Changed
Risk factors · Feb 7, 2025 → Feb 5, 2026
91 added · 79 removed between the two most recent 10-Ks. The risks a company starts — or stops — disclosing are often the story.
Newly disclosed
For example, in November 2025 during the partial government shutdown, the FAA issued an emergency order mandating an industry-wide reduction in flights at 40 major U.S. airports.
The Company’s transformational initiatives are discussed in more detail under “Business.” The Company made certain assumptions in developing its strategic plans and initiatives related to, for example, customer demand (in light of changing economic conditions), fuel costs, delivery of aircraft, aircraft certification approval timelines, labor market constraints and related costs, supply chain constraints, inflationary pressures, voluntary or mandatory groundings of aircraft, its network, competition, market consolidation, and other macroeconomic and geopolitical factors.
Information Technology, Cybersecurity, and Data Privacy Risks • The Company is heavily dependent on technology to operate its business; any failure, disruption, breach, or delay in the Company’s information systems or in implementation of necessary changes could materially adversely affect its operations. • The Company is increasingly exposed to cybersecurity attacks and data incidents impacting its IT Systems, and such incidents could have a disruptive and material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, or results of operations. • The Company is expanding its use of AI and machine-learning, and any failure in its related strategy, compliance with regulations, or risk management could materially adversely affect its operations, reputation, and/or financial position.
Any failure in the Company’s AI implementation strategy, compliance with regulations, or failure to otherwise manage the risks related to AI technologies effectively could materially adversely affect its operations, reputation, and/or financial position.
The Company could also face increased risks of litigation resulting from any enhanced disclosure requirements related to climate change. 41 Table of Contents Concern among consumers of the impacts of climate change may mean some customers choose to fly less frequently or fly on an airline they perceive as operating in a manner that is more sustainable to the climate, and customers may choose to use alternatives to travel, such as virtual meetings and workspaces.
Certain regulators, such as the SEC and various state agencies, as well as nongovernmental organizations and other private actors have filed lawsuits under various securities and consumer protection laws alleging that certain sustainability statements, goals, or standards were misleading, false, or otherwise deceptive.
The Company could face increased litigation risks relating to alleged direct or indirect climate-related damages resulting from the Company’s operations, statements alleged to have been made by the Company or others in the aviation industry regarding climate change risks, or in connection with any future voluntary or mandatory disclosures the Company may make regarding reported emissions.
Any damage to the Company’s reputation or brand as a result of such litigation, public criticism, or failure to meet or maintain its sustainability plans or goals could adversely affect the Company’s operations, financial condition, and future results.
Adverse litigation results in any of these cases could adversely impact the Company’s operational flexibility and result in the imposition of damages and fines, which could potentially be significant. 44 Table of Contents The Company’s reputation and brand could be harmed if it were to experience significant negative publicity through social media or otherwise.
In connection with any activist campaign, the Company may choose to initiate, or may become subject to, litigation, which could serve as a further distraction to the Board, management, and Employees and require the Company to incur significant additional costs. 45 Table of Contents The Company cannot predict, and no assurances can be given as to, the consequences of the settlement of prior activism or the outcome or timing of any matters relating to the foregoing actions by activist shareholders and its responses thereto or the ultimate effects on its business, liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations.
Additionally, telecommunications outages such as the 2025 Newark outages and September 2025 Dallas outages have caused air traffic controllers to lose radar and communications, resulting in ground stops, delays, and cancellations.
However, based on higher fuel hedging premium costs over time and other factors, the Company terminated its remaining fuel hedge positions in second quarter 2025 and does not intend to add new fuel derivatives to its portfolio.
No longer disclosed
For example, on January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order pausing certain funding disbursements under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022; the impact of this Executive Order on the use of and investment in SAF, current and future SAF projects, and, ultimately, the Company's operations is uncertain at this time.
For example, as discussed in more detail under “Business – Regulation,” the federal government, as well as several state and local governments, the governments of other countries, and the United Nations’ International Civil Aviation Organization have implemented legislative and regulatory proposals and voluntary measures intended to reduce GHG emissions.
For example, lower-carbon technologies, such as SAF, are currently not available at scale or priced cost-competitively as compared to conventional jet fuel and may take a significant amount of time to develop and mature, and the cost to transition to them could be prohibitively expensive without appropriate government support, policies, and incentives in place (including tax credits).
For example, CARB has previously proposed amendments to California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“LCFS”) regulation that would subject intrastate fossil jet fuel to the LCFS, although CARB eventually abandoned this proposal.
Information Technology, Cybersecurity, and Data Privacy Risks • The Company is heavily dependent on technology to operate its business and continues to implement substantial changes to its information systems; any failure, disruption, breach, or delay in the Company’s information systems or in implementation of necessary changes could materially adversely affect its operations. • The Company is increasingly exposed to cybersecurity attacks and data incidents impacting its IT Systems, or those of the Company’s vendors or service providers.
The Company could also face increased litigation risks relating to alleged direct or indirect climate-related damages resulting from the Company’s operations, statements alleged to have been made by the Company or others in the aviation industry regarding climate change risks, or in connection with any future voluntary or mandatory disclosures the Company may make regarding reported emissions, particularly given the inherent uncertainties and estimations with respect to calculating and reporting GHG emissions. 48 Table of Contents While the new presidential administration is not expected to pursue federal efforts to significantly increase sustainability-related regulatory requirements or require the disclosure of certain climate-related information, the Company may still face pressure from local and state governments as they continue advancing their own climate-related policies, as well as voluntary pressure from Customers, stakeholders, and financial institutions.
Jet fuel and oil constituted approximately 21.4 percent of the Company's operating expenses during 2024, and the Company's ability to control the cost of fuel is subject to the external factors discussed in “The Company's business can be significantly impacted by the availability of jet fuel and high and/or volatile fuel prices, and the Company's operations are subject to disruption in the event of any delayed supply of fuel; therefore, the Company's strategic plans and future profitability are likely to be impacted by the Company's ability to effectively address fuel price increases and fuel price volatility and availability.” Salaries, wages, and benefits constituted approximately 45.1 percent of the Company's operating expenses during 2024.
In January 2024, the FAA announced that it had informed Boeing that the FAA would not (i) agree to any request from Boeing for an expansion in production or (ii) approve additional production lines for the MAX aircraft until the FAA is satisfied that any applicable Boeing quality control issues are resolved.
As discussed under “Business—Regulation—Environmental Regulation,” the State of California enacted a number of new climate-disclosure related laws in October 2023, including the CCDAA and CRFRA, that require GHG emissions or climate-related risk disclosures, and the VCMDA that requires disclosure regarding the use of voluntary carbon offsets in certain circumstances.
Adverse litigation results in any of these cases could adversely impact the Company’s operational flexibility and result in the imposition of damages and fines, which could potentially be significant.
As discussed under "Business - Cost Structure," although market jet fuel prices were volatile throughout the year, Fuel and oil expense for 2024 remained high, primarily due to an increase in fuel gallons consumed.
In January 2024, Boeing announced plans to withdraw an exemption request with the FAA and incorporate an engineering solution as part of the -7 certification process.