8-KThe WireRoutine
Shareholder Vote
Filed Jun 14, 2024 · 2y ago · Accession 0001104659-24-071439
Plain English
Material event — a significant development the company must disclose promptly.
Read the source below for the full document.
Filing text
View original ↗UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported):
June 13, 2024
Tesla, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Texas
001-34756
91-2197729
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
(Commission
File Number)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1 Tesla Road
Austin , Texas 78725
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, and
Zip Code)
( 512 ) 516-8177
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including
Area Code
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended
to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction
A.2. below):
¨
Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
¨
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.14a-12)
¨
Pre-commencement communication pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
¨
Pre-commencement communication pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading
Symbol(s)
Name
of each exchange on which registered
Common
stock
TSLA
The Nasdaq Global
Select Market
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR §230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR §240.12b-2).
Emerging growth company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant
to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
At Tesla, Inc.’s (“ Tesla ”) 2024 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders (the “ Annual Meeting ”) held on June 13, 2024, Tesla’s stockholders voted on the following twelve
proposals and Tesla’s inspector of election certified the vote tabulations indicated below .
Proposal 1
The individuals listed below were elected as Class
II directors at the Annual Meeting to serve on Tesla’s Board of Directors (“ Board ”) for a term of three years
or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
James Murdoch
1,568,468,453
710,657,343
31,143,094
335,111,943
Kimbal Musk
1,814,064,783
468,987,640
27,216,467
335,111,943
Proposal 2
Proposal 2 was a management proposal to approve
executive compensation on a non-binding advisory basis. This proposal was approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
1,834,794,743
449,639,303
25,834,844
335,111,943
Proposal 3
Proposal 3 was a management proposal to approve
the redomestication of Tesla from Delaware to Texas by conversion. This proposal was approved. Approval of the proposal required the affirmative
vote of each of:
·
the majority of outstanding shares of Tesla common stock entitled to vote on the proposal (the “ Conversion Standard ”),
and
·
the majority of the total votes of shares of Tesla common stock not owned, directly or indirectly, by Elon Musk or Kimbal Musk, represented
in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal (the “ Conversion Disinterested Standard ”).
The results of the stockholder vote are reported
below:
(1)
Pursuant to the Conversion Standard, the votes were as follows:
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
2,000,873,803
293,910,071
15,485,016
335,111,943
Accordingly, the votes cast in favor of approving Proposal 3 constituted
approximately 63% of outstanding shares of Tesla common stock entitled to vote on the proposal.
(2)
Pursuant to the Conversion Disinterested Standard, the votes were as follows:
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
1,588,203,007
293,910,071
15,485,016
335,111,943
Accordingly, the votes cast in favor of approving Proposal 3 constituted
approximately 84% of the total votes of shares of Tesla common stock not owned, directly or indirectly, by Elon Musk or Kimbal Musk, represented
in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal.
Proposal 4
Proposal 4 was a management proposal to ratify
the 100% performance-based stock option award to Elon Musk that was proposed to and approved by our stockholders in 2018. This proposal
was approved. Approval of the proposal required the affirmative vote of each of:
· the majority of the total votes of shares of Tesla common stock
cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting on the proposal, pursuant to the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the “ NASDAQ
Standard ”),
and
· the majority of the voting power of the shares present in person
or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal, pursuant to Tesla’s amended and restated bylaws
(the “ Bylaws Standard ”),
and
· the majority of the total votes of shares of Tesla common stock
not owned, directly or indirectly, by Elon Musk or Kimbal Musk, cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting on the proposal, pursuant
to the resolutions of the Board of Directors of Tesla (the “ Ratification Disinterested Standard ”).
The results of the stockholder vote are reported
below:
(1) Pursuant to the NASDAQ Standard, the votes were as follows:
For
Against
Broker Non-Votes
1,760,780,650
528,908,419
335,111,943
Accordingly, the votes cast in favor of approving Proposal 4 constituted
approximately 77% of the total votes of shares of Tesla common stock cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting on the proposal.
(2) Pursuant to the Bylaws Standard, the votes were as follows:
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
1,760,780,650
528,908,419
20,579,821
335,111,943
Accordingly, the votes cast in favor of approving Proposal 4 constituted
approximately 76% of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote
on the proposal.
(3) Pursuant to the Ratification Disinterested Standard, the votes
were as follows:
For
Against
Broker Non-Votes
1,348,109,854
528,908,419
335,111,943
Accordingly, the votes cast in factor of approving Proposal 4 constituted
approximately 72% of all votes cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting on the proposal, excluding votes of shares owned, directly
or indirectly, by Messrs. Elon and Kimbal Musk.
Proposal 5
Proposal 5 was a management proposal to ratify
the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2024. This proposal was approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
2,545,112,670
66,178,057
34,090,106
0
Proposal 6
Proposal 6 was a non-binding advisory stockholder
proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year. This proposal was approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
1,231,680,337
1,044,766,276
33,822,277
335,111,943
Proposal 7
Proposal 7 was a non-binding advisory stockholder
proposal regarding simple majority voting provisions in our governing documents. This proposal was approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
1,225,968,057
1,047,335,839
36,964,994
335,111,943
Proposal 8
Proposal 8 was a non-binding advisory stockholder
proposal regarding annual reporting on anti-harassment and discrimination efforts. This proposal was not approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
712,788,260
1,547,103,308
50,377,322
335,111,943
Proposal 9
Proposal 9 was a non-binding advisory stockholder
proposal regarding adoption of a freedom of association and collective bargaining policy. This proposal was not approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
462,903,318
1,783,899,772
63,465,800
335,111,943
Proposal 10
Proposal 10 was a non-binding advisory stockholder
proposal regarding reporting on effects and risks associated with electromagnetic radiation and wireless technologies. This proposal was
not approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
84,116,666
2,156,432,223
69,720,001
335,111,943
Proposal 11
Proposal 11 was a non-binding advisory stockholder
proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into senior
executive compensation plans. This proposal was not approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
229,393,871
2,025,404,233
55,470,786
335,111,943
Proposal 12
Proposal 12 was a non-binding advisory stockholder
proposal regarding committing to a moratorium on sourcing minerals from deep sea mining. This proposal was not approved.
For
Against
Abstained
Broker Non-Votes
172,864,517
2,071,493,645
65,910,728
335,111,943
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.
TESLA, INC.
By:
/s/Brandon Ehrhart
Brandon Ehrhart
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Date: June 14, 2024
Filing details
- Company
- Tesla, Inc.
- Ticker
- TSLA
- CIK
- 1318605
- Form type
- 8-K
- Filing date
- Jun 14, 2024
- Report date
- Jun 13, 2024
- Document
- tm2413800d31_8k.htm
- Size
- 234 KB